InfotainMe's Page

Infotain... Thank you for your comment on Hoboken Journal about my real estate sign. Did you see my post on my site that went up on my site (www.hobokenrealestatemonitor.com) the same day unbeknownst to me that Perry had posted that article. I don't go to his site. I have the expressed permission of my client, the owner of 704 Hudson. He wrote me a lovely letter which I posted to my site along with a wider shot of 704 that shows the sign in relation to the house. In 411 rants supposedly someone said it was 6 feet tall. 1) I think that was Perry himself making that comment trying to strike controversy. By looking at my pic you can see that it isn't. The signage is in line with what all other agents have when they sell a whole building, is on private property and is perfectly legal. It's like any other business where advertising is a part of it.

I appreciated that you very nicely pointed out that what Mason was doing was illegal - posting in parks, telephone poles and street lamp posts, etc and truly excessive. She knows the ordinance as many people pointed it out to her over the span of the last few years now and she goes on anyway. It's an example of how she thinks she can just do what she wants just because she can pay for it.

I think she is the 'posterchild' of a politician who will take any point of view to get a elected and thinks that she can buy the election. An election is not about her or any particular person, her political career, etc. It's what's best for the people as a whole.

Thank you again.

Just wanted to say 1) my name is Antonucci not Ant i nucci. There is someone on 411 that took the name Antinucci and I don't want anyone to think that's me.

2) I hope people noticed that I was not asked for comment. Also please note that others tried to post a very different account and their posts did not go up. One comment went up and then was pulled. He filtered out the comments that did't agree with his version. I also have a feeling Perry didn't write it himself not that that matters. It's his site. He is responsible if his threads are biased and distorted.

411 is a tabloid. It's not a real news outlet. It's the online news equivalent of reality television.... he says it's real but it's completely scripted. I sent an email out to the union contract petition signers the night before endorsing Dawn.

InfotainMe said:

The release to 411 suggests something not quite kosher. IE, if it's news, give it to a newspaper, no? You give it to 411 because you want the photo-shopped version out there. They ran a story about Donna Antinucci tearing down a Mason sign; not a word about a theft of a 40' Zimmer banner. The site is a complete disgrace at this point, and it's beneficiaries are, by extension, disgraced.