Tags:
It is probably not so easy to predict how the Mason votes will be split. One would hope, though, that those Mason voters who are pro change in Hoboken will acknowledge that change will not happen under a mayor Cammorano (no right-sizing of HPD/HFD, no reval, no union give-backs, etc.) and will thus vote for Dawn and her slate who have clearly articulated their intentions to tackle these problems.
Another important issue will be to wake up the dormant portion of the Hoboken citizenry who sat out the first round of this election cycle. How can they be motivated to vote in the runoff? I was quite surprised that even the 47% tax increase was not enough to wake up many of those who got hit by it.
I agree with you on the split Sven. My question is what will Dawn do to mend fences? I think alof of people who were reform but didn't vote for dawn the first go round are worried about her ability to get things done w/ out the interference of Lenz and other HCDO people. I for one don't want to just trade Roberts for another candidate who gets manipulated by the machine. If Dawn can step up and convince people she can make a difference then I think you'll see more of the disaffected voters come out and support her. My other worry for Dawn is that she spent most of her $$ making it into the run-off. I hope the grassroots movement will be enough to beat back Cammarano.
Sven said:It is probably not so easy to predict how the Mason votes will be split. One would hope, though, that those Mason voters who are pro change in Hoboken will acknowledge that change will not happen under a mayor Cammorano (no right-sizing of HPD/HFD, no reval, no union give-backs, etc.) and will thus vote for Dawn and her slate who have clearly articulated their intentions to tackle these problems.
Another important issue will be to wake up the dormant portion of the Hoboken citizenry who sat out the first round of this election cycle. How can they be motivated to vote in the runoff? I was quite surprised that even the 47% tax increase was not enough to wake up many of those who got hit by it.
Tony, I am far from sexist but I am a realist. I didn't vote for Dawn the first time only because of her associations w/ people like you and Lenz. I voted for Beth so that puts me far from sexist. However I didn't vote for Beth's slate because I didn't believe in those people but I believed in Beth.
Now since you seem clear that you don't like dissenters from Zimmer unless they are particularly clear. I'll entertain you for now. Dawn didn't get my vote first time around because she was quoted as saying that she felt she couldn't get anything done from her council seat and the only logical move for her was to see if she could do better from the mayor's chair. She has no record of getting anything done and almost lost the run-off for her council seat only a few years ago. Speaking to people about stopping flooding is not the same as actually reducing flooding. I can speak to people all day long. So no I don't think she was able to deliver on one of her campaign issues which is why she did not win my vote. My decision as a voter was that if this was what she had to show as a record then how could she possibly get results from being mayor? I think alot of people seem to have forgotten to ask this question. In my OWN opinion, I am left with two very disappointing choices for mayor. Since I refuse to allow my town to be taken over by another Robert's administration I am stuck with a hard decision. I hope Dawn can prove to me and others who want to see action that she can get the job done and not just spin a different tale.
February 13, 2012 to February 24, 2012 – Online
A team of Hoboken parents and educators is putting together a proposal for a new, science-themed charter school for Hoboken. As part of this process, they are reaching out to the community to gauge…
Organized by Laura Siegel | Type: survey
© 2012 Created by Administrator.
Powered by
.