Tags:
Is there any effort to push the city council and mayor to follow up on the audits recommendations? I do not expect them to fire 50 cops tomorrow but they cannot ignore the findings. I am appalled that the police chief wants to hire more cops and that our public safety director has not taken the time to read the entire report. (see http://hoboken.patch.com/articles/police-chief-falco-i-will-ask-for...).
Based on the reports recommendations and Alicea's lackluster performance in the budget hearings, is there any reason that the mayor is keeping him on? I heard rumors that Councilman Lenz has a deal with him - he keeps his job and supports lenz for the 4th ward - but this choice is soley the mayors. He is an at will employee (no police union to protect him) and a carryover from the wonderful cammarano administration. If we are going to fire police who, for the most part, do their jobs, how can she keep on someone who does nothing simply to get votes for one of her councilmen?
From what I've heard, you can expect there to be some squaring off over this and initial digging in to respective positions. Last night, Councilman Lenz called and Mile Square View posted the story related to this.
Councilman Lenz: "Police audit is a game changer."
Peter Lavine said:Is there any effort to push the city council and mayor to follow up on the audits recommendations? I do not expect them to fire 50 cops tomorrow but they cannot ignore the findings. I am appalled that the police chief wants to hire more cops and that our public safety director has not taken the time to read the entire report. (see http://hoboken.patch.com/articles/police-chief-falco-i-will-ask-for...).
Based on the reports recommendations and Alicea's lackluster performance in the budget hearings, is there any reason that the mayor is keeping him on? I heard rumors that Councilman Lenz has a deal with him - he keeps his job and supports lenz for the 4th ward - but this choice is soley the mayors. He is an at will employee (no police union to protect him) and a carryover from the wonderful cammarano administration. If we are going to fire police who, for the most part, do their jobs, how can she keep on someone who does nothing simply to get votes for one of her councilmen?
Notice how there was no committment to do anything in his statement. He uses many vague words but if you are going to talk about it, committ to do something. He did nothing. The recommendation to eliminate the position of the public safety director is the simplest and least controversial one in the whole document. Lenz's avoidance of that recommendation, given Alicea's sad performance at the budget meetings and his carryover status, raises red flags.
Can you offer another explaination for his weak response?
SmartyJones said:From what I've heard, you can expect there to be some squaring off over this and initial digging in to respective positions. Last night, Councilman Lenz called and Mile Square View posted the story related to this.
Councilman Lenz: "Police audit is a game changer."
Peter Lavine said:Is there any effort to push the city council and mayor to follow up on the audits recommendations? I do not expect them to fire 50 cops tomorrow but they cannot ignore the findings. I am appalled that the police chief wants to hire more cops and that our public safety director has not taken the time to read the entire report. (see http://hoboken.patch.com/articles/police-chief-falco-i-will-ask-for...).
Based on the reports recommendations and Alicea's lackluster performance in the budget hearings, is there any reason that the mayor is keeping him on? I heard rumors that Councilman Lenz has a deal with him - he keeps his job and supports lenz for the 4th ward - but this choice is soley the mayors. He is an at will employee (no police union to protect him) and a carryover from the wonderful cammarano administration. If we are going to fire police who, for the most part, do their jobs, how can she keep on someone who does nothing simply to get votes for one of her councilmen?
Is there any effort to push the city council and mayor to follow up on the audits recommendations? I do not expect them to fire 50 cops tomorrow but they cannot ignore the findings. I am appalled that the police chief wants to hire more cops and that our public safety director has not taken the time to read the entire report. (see http://hoboken.patch.com/articles/police-chief-falco-i-will-ask-for...).
Based on the reports recommendations and Alicea's lackluster performance in the budget hearings, is there any reason that the mayor is keeping him on? I heard rumors that Councilman Lenz has a deal with him - he keeps his job and supports lenz for the 4th ward - but this choice is soley the mayors. He is an at will employee (no police union to protect him) and a carryover from the wonderful cammarano administration. If we are going to fire police who, for the most part, do their jobs, how can she keep on someone who does nothing simply to get votes for one of her councilmen?
What about other areas for staff cuts? The one time I've visited the city hall to get a parking permit, the employees there were very rude and could hardly be bothered to help me.
Could similar audit be done on other areas?
I call the Police audit the final "great awakening". I repeat; it is time for action. This report puts the final nail in the "do nothing" governance we have seen.
The Mayor and the Council have to act NOW; the nation, the state and this city are all broke. You cannot get blood out of a stone. It is time for the too long awaited cuts!
February 13, 2012 to February 24, 2012 – Online
A team of Hoboken parents and educators is putting together a proposal for a new, science-themed charter school for Hoboken. As part of this process, they are reaching out to the community to gauge…
Organized by Laura Siegel | Type: survey
© 2012 Created by Administrator.
Powered by
.